All Praise is for Allaah
alone, and prayer and salutations upon the Messenger of Allaah and upon his
family and companions and those who follow his guidance. As what follows/to
proceed:
Shaykh Rabee’ was asked about Jamaa’ah ut-Tableegh, so he said:
I have never gone with this Jamaa’ah, but indeed, I went for work, then like
to Kashmir. And I became vacated from this work, and I passed through Delhi, so
it was said to me: “Let us go to such and such place to visit the da’wah center
of Jamaa’at ut-Tableegh, and to, like, Nizaam-ud-Deen.”
Nizaam-ud-Deen, this is a Masjid nearby the da’wah center of Jamaa’at
ut-Tableegh, and
inside of it are five graves, atop which are domes, which
are worshipped alongside of Allaah, a clear worship, no dust on it
(i.e. a
figurative expression meaning that it is plain for everyone to see).
Then we went out to the Masjid of Jamaa’at ut-Tableegh, and it was being said,
like, the people were disagreeing with each other as to whether there were
graves in it or there weren’t graves in it.
So ‘Abdur-Rubb asked, this one whom I have mentioned, he asked a number of them:
“Is there in this masjid – the masjid of Jamaa’at ut-Tableegh – a grave or some
graves?”
The clever ones [amongst them] said: “No, there are no graves in it. The grave
of Illiyaas [1] is buried in Makkah,” or such-and-such place, some far away
place.
So he continued to ask until an individual guided him or informed him
that
the grave of Illiyaas was in the masjid, and next to it, the grave of his wife.
Then he came with the brother ‘Abdur-Rubb to the two graves and stood over them.
Then after he made sure [that these were the graves], he came back and said:
“Come, I will show you these two graves.”
So we looked, and so he said: “This is the grave of Illiyaas, and this is the
grave of his wife,
and they are inside of the masjid.”
Then after that,
we verified that there were four graves in this masjid, not
two. We verified [this fact] from some trustworthy people who accompanied
Jamaa’at ut-Tableegh for years and knew this true state of affairs… [End of
Shaykh's words]
From the book Jamaa’at ut-Tableegh (p. 450). The actual audio is also available
here:
http://www.sahab.fm/index.php?action=file&id=6
Also refer to this thread on sahab:
http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.php?s=&postid=326865
Shaykh Rabee’ had also said that Some papers reached
him containing statements of
the two Salafee Allaamahs’ Shaykh Ibn Baaz and
Shaykh Ibn al-‘Uthaymeen
which the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh circulate amongst the ignorant and those who do
not know the reality of their false manhaj and ‘aqeedah.
And the reality is that the statements of the
two Shaykhs supports them.
So the statement of
Shaykh Ibn Baaz is based
upon a report from a Tableeghee man, or one who is sympathetic to them, which
was narrated to Shaykh Ibn Baaz contrary to that which they are upon and
depicted them contrary to their true nature, and confirms that which we say the
statement of Shaykh Ibn Baaz (rahima-hullaah):
"…and no doubt, certainly the people are
in severe need of such good meetings gathering upon the remembrance of Allaah
and inviting to holding steadfast to Islaam and applying it’s teachings and
ridding the Tawheed (of Allaah) of (all) innovations and superstitions..."
[see his fatwa, reference number 1007, dated 17/08/1407 A.H which the Jamaa’ah
at-Tableegh now circulate].
So this (fatwa) suggests that the narrator
mentioned in his report that certainly that this Jamaa’ah calls to holding
steadfast to Islaam, applying it’s teachings and ridding the Tawheed (of
Allaah) of (all) innovations and superstitions. So, as a result, the Shaykh has
praised them.
And if the narrator of the report spoke the
truth and depicted them upon their reality and explained the truth of their
false manhaj, then we would not have seen from Imaam Ibn Baaz, the Salafee, the
monotheist, except impugnation towards them and warning against them and their
innovations, as he had done in the last fatwa regarding them attached to this
one (above).
And in the statement of Allaamah Ibn al-‘Uthaymeen
as to that which supports them, refer to his statement as follows:
"Remark: If the difference (of opinion) is
in ‘aqeedah issues, then it is obligatory to correct (this) and that which
opposes the way of the Salaf. For indeed, it is obligatory to detest it and warn
those who tread (the path of) that which opposes the methodology of the Salaf in
this aspect. [See Fataawa Ibn al-‘Uthaymeen - Volume 2, Page 939-944, similar
to that which the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh distribute].
And no doubt the difference of opinion amongst
the Salafees, the Ahlus-Sunnah wat-Tawheed and the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh is an
extreme and profound difference in ‘aqeedah and manhaj.
For they are upon the way of the
Maatureediyyah,
those who have innovated in the attributes of Allaah and who are from the
Soofiyyah in their worship and manners, giving the oath of allegiance and from
that, these sects uphold (the belief) in al-Hulool and Wahdatil-Wujood and shirk
with the graves and other than that from (their) falsehood.
And without a doubt the noble Shaykh Ibn al-‘Uthaymeen
does not know, and if he were to know this about them, then certainly he would
have denounced them for the falsehood (upon which they are on) and would have
severely warned against them. He would certainly have trodden the Salafee path
with them just as both his Shaykhs,
Imaam Muhammed Ibn Ibraaheem and
Imaam Ibn Baaz had done. And just as
Shaykh
al-Albaanee, Shaykh ‘Abdur-Razzaaq
‘Afeefee, Shaykh Fowzaan, Shaykh Hamood at-Tuwayjaree,
Shaykh Taqqee ad-Deen al-Hilaalee, Shaykh Sa’d al-Husayn, Shaykh Sayf ar-Rahmaan, Shaykh Muhammed
Aslam had (all) done with their great publications, which clarified the
falsehood of the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh and their danger and that which they are
upon in their false ‘aqeedah and manhaj so the serious student of knowledge
should refer to them.
And Shaykh ‘Abdur-Rahmaan al-Misree reverted
(back) from having written in praise of the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh and he
admitted his mistakes to me.
As for Yoosuf al-Malaahee, then he is amongst
those who spent many years with them, then wrote a book about them which
explained their falsehood and corrupt ‘aqeedah, then sadly he reverted back
from the truth and then wrote another book about them. His first book assists
him and that which the scholars of manhaj wrote about them refutes his
falsehood; and the (most) important rule is (in the science of al-Jarh
wat-Ta’deel) is that al-Jarh takes precedence over and above at-Ta’deel. So
it nullifies all praise from anyone, even if the Tableeghees uphold the correct
Islaamic rules (teachings) and trod the path of the people of knowledge and
advice for Islaam and the Muslims.
[1] He is Muhammad Illiyaas, the heretical Deobandee who founded Jamaa’at
ut-Tableegh in the 1920s, may Allaah give him what he deserves. For further
information on him and his evil sect, one should refer to the book “al-Qawl ul-Baleegh
fit-Tahdheer min Jamaa’at it-Tableegh” of the Noble Shaykh Hamood Bin ‘Abdullaah
at-Tuwayjiree (d. 1413). Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan praised this book, saying that
he did not leave out anything with regards to his exposing this deviant sect.
